Showing posts with label Civil Liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil Liberty. Show all posts

November 04, 2008

America the beautiful


Dreams do come true.
Photo by Kuz'n Kirk

Today, November 4, 2008, we celebrate All-America Day -- a day that heralds a seismic shift, from the past to the future, in the country's landscape.

Today we celebrate hope, opportunity, and the vision of a more perfect union. We mark not the end of one man's journey to the presidency, but the beginning of a new journey for every man, woman and child who ever dreamed the American dream.

Tomorrow begins the next chapter in the fulfillment of America's promise. That is the challenge that we must meet and that we will meet. United, our best days are ahead.

Now more than ever, this is one country, America the beautiful.

October 10, 2008

People of faith oppose Florida Amendment 2


A Statement of Opposition to Amendment 2

As clergy members from a broad spectrum of religious traditions we hold diverse views regarding marriage. However, we are united in our opposition to amending the Florida Constitution to define marriage.

We share a serious concern that proposed Amendment 2, which will appear on the November 4 ballot would infringe on religious liberty. We believe that marriage decisions should be left to couples, their clergy, and their religious beliefs — not the State of Florida.

[ . . . . ]

Amendment 2 would undermine religious liberty. Florida’s religious communities do not support this amendment. As leaders of these communities, we pledge to vote no on Amendment 2 and urge you to join us.

More . . .
  • Florida Clergy for Fairness
  • SayNo2.com
  • Vote No on 2
  • April 30, 2008

    Florida becomes 36th state to pass anti-bullying law

      Passage was eight years in the making

      (Tallahassee) After 8 years of effort on the part of hundreds of students, parents, educators and civil rights groups, The Florida Safe Schools Coalition celebrates the passage today of a statewide anti-bullying bill.

      During today's unanimous vote, Senators zeroed in on the issue of whether the broad prohibition on bullying requires schools to address specific forms of harassment, including anti-gay bullying.

      Senator Nan Rich asked, "Does the bill prohibit harassment based on a student's actual or perceived disability, ethnicity, national origin, gender, gender identity, physical appearance, sexual orientation or other distinguishing personal characteristic in the exactly the same way that it prohibits sexual, racial or religious harassment, which are specified in the bill?"

      "Yes it does," said Senator Baker, the bills sponsor.

      In so doing, sponsors in the House and Senate made clear the legislative intent requires schools to ensure those protections at the local level.

      "Today's passage of the anti-bullying law represents the culmination of an eight-year effort by a strong coalition of over 100 organizations dedicated to the safety of Florida's students," said Nadine Smith, Executive Director for Equality Florida. "The legislature has made clear that any school that fails to prevent and respond to anti-gay bullying and to protect every student will be in violation of this law and will face the consequences. We will hold them accountable."

    More . . . Anti-bullying bill passes House and Senate

    Meanwhile, on the religious front . . . .
      Methodists hold line on homosexuality
      FORT WORTH, Texas | Representatives of the United Methodist Church turned back attempts to liberalize its policy on homosexuality Wednesday. Almost 1,000 delegates to the church's General Conference rejected a committee proposal, leaving in place the position that the practice of homosexuality is "incompatible with Christian teaching."

      April 11, 2008

      A moral call to arms: Defeat the 'Hate Amendment'

        Proposed Florida Amendment 2: "Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized."
      Yesterday, Kenneth Quinnell, of the Florida Progressive Coalition, listed 15 arguments against the Amendment . . . Today, Mustang Bobby, of Bark Bark Woof Woof, responded with a follow-on . . . I recommend both essays to anyone who cares about human rights at their most basic level.

      February 12, 2008

      Senate approves Bush's secret spy program


      I am embarrassed to be represented by two U. S. Senators who today demonstrated a total disregard for the U. S. Constitution:

      The Senate overwhelming voted Tuesday evening to legalize President Bush's warrantless wiretapping program and grant amnesty to the phone companies that helped out with the domestic spying.

      Democrats voting for the bill:

      Evan Bayh (D-IN), Tom Carper (D-DE), Robert Casey (D-PA), Kent Conrad (D-ND), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Mary Landrieu (D-LA) Joe Lieberman (ID-CT), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Jim Webb (D-VA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

      All Republican senators, including John McCain and Mel Martinez (FL) voted for the bill, except for Lindsey Graham (SC) who did not vote.



      February 01, 2008

      Rainbows prohibited over 'fountain of youth'


      PONCE DE LEON, FL (AP) -- The American Civil Liberties Union claims that Ponce de Leon High School in Holmes County kept students from having rainbow stickers on their notebooks, suppressing their right to free speech.

      The lawsuit against the Holmes County School Board and Ponce de Leon High School was filed Thursday in federal court in Panama City.

      The ACLU says the school told them any form of expression in support for gay rights would "likely be disruptive." It also claims the school board's attorney said a rainbow sticker could mean students are members of an "illegal organization."

      More . . .


      January 24, 2008

      WHAAM! Hatemongering kicks into overdrive


      The Wingnut Hatemongering Anti-America Machine (WHAAM!) is sick but very much alive.

      WHAAM!-o #1, from Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee

      BeliefNet Question: "Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations."

      Rev. Huckabee: "Well, I don't think that's a radical view to say we're going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal." - 'The Lord truly gave me wisdom'

      WHAAM!-o #2, from Faux Noose's John Gibson

      Opening his radio show with funeral music yesterday, Fox News host John Gibson callously mocked the death of actor Heath Ledger, calling him a "weirdo" with a "serious drug problem."

      Playing an audio clip of the iconic quote, "I wish I knew how to quit you" from Ledger's gay romance movie Brokeback Mountain, Gibson disdainfully quipped, "Well, he found out how to quit you."

      Laughing, Gibson then played another clip from Brokeback Mountain in which Ledger said, "We're dead," followed by his own, mocking "We're dead" before playing the clip again.

      And it goes downhill from there: John Gibson mocks 'weirdo' Heath Ledger's death

      WHAAM!-o #3, from Westboro Baptist Church

      "WBC will picket this pervert's funeral, in religious protest.

      "God hates the sordid, tacky bucket of slime seasoned with vomit known as Brokeback Mountain - and He hates all persons having anything to whatsoever to do with it.

      "Heath Ledger is now in Hell, and has begun serving his eternal sentence there." - Hate group to picket Ledger's funeral


      September 17, 2007

      Today is history's future

      Happy Constitution Day!

      "I have sworn . . . eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." (Thomas Jefferson)

      Completed on September 17, 1787, and later ratified by special conventions in each of the original thirteen American states, the Constitution for the United States represents the supreme law of the United States of America and is the oldest comprehensive written national constitution still in force. - History of U.S. Constitution
      That constitution is threatened today by a president who regards it on a par with Larry Craig's toilet paper - a useful symbol when it serves a personal need, but trash when it conflicts with his authoritarian agenda:
      "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!" - The rant: Bush on the Constitution

      September 01, 2007

      Goodbye, Larry, we hardly knew you (thankfully)

      WASHINGTON (AFP) - US Republican Senator Larry Craig announced his [intended] resignation Saturday after being caught in an undercover sting allegedly soliciting sex with a man in an airport bathroom.

      "It is with sadness and deep regret that I announce that it is my intent to resign from the Senate effective September 30," Craig said at a news conference in Boise, Idaho, the state he represents.
      Try as I may, I find little compassion in my heart for a man who did everything within his power to destroy better men and women than himself. Hating oneself is one thing: transferring that hatred to others, whose only fault is living their lives as genuine human beings, is another.

      When Larry Craig was not busy hanging out in restroom stalls, he was projecting a wide stance against gays and lesbians, their families and the people they love. His espoused policies perpetuated civil discrimination and a repressive atmosphere in which a group of men and women are denied basic human rights, some young people are driven to suicide, and still others are beaten to a pulp.

      Craig adopted a strong anti-gay agenda as a cover for his innermost secrets, prowling for sexual kicks in such a sleazy fashion that the discretion of his restroom Romeos was practically guaranteed. Who would tell?

      A liar, a coward, a hypocrite without a soul, Larry Craig covered his reprehensible activities by an even greater sin - bashing others.

      He is caught. Time to pay the piper.


      February 16, 2007

      Appeals Court finds no right to sexual privacy


      In case you were wondering . . .

      Matt Conigliaro, at Abstract Appeal, reports:

        An Alabama law bans the commercial distribution of devices designed or marketed primarily for human genital stimulation. Does that prohibition violate the privacy right that the U.S. Supreme Court has found inherent in the Fourteenth Amendment?

        No, said the Eleventh Circuit in this decision released on February 14.

        The court held no fundamental right to sexual privacy exists in the federal constitution and, applying only the low-level rational basis test, concluded that public morality was a legitimate and sufficient justification for the law's commercial-based constraints.

      [Desperate Housewives to film in Alabama next season]


      February 11, 2007

      College course in gay lit gets 'dishonorable mention'



      BOULDER, Colo. -- A self-proclaimed conservative group targeting college liberalism is assailing a University of Colorado course that examines gay and lesbian literature.

      The CU course on the Foundation's hit list includes poetry by Walt Whitman, who some say was gay, as well as works of novelist Virginia Woolf, who had an affair with a woman. The syllabus also includes films such as the gay cowboy tale "Brokeback Mountain."

      There is a waiting list of students eager to take the course. [....]

      The Young America's Foundation, based outside Washington, DC, gives the CU course "Introduction to Lesbian, Bisexual and Gay Literature," a "dishonorable mention" in a study titled "The Dirty Dozen: America's Most Bizarre and Politically Correct College Courses."

      On its Web site, the Foundation says, "The nation's campuses continue to be staffed and controlled by leftist radicals who seek a monopoly on what is said and thought."

      Foundation spokesman Jason Mattera said the courses edge out traditional scholarship and waste money and time. A recent poll, he said, finds Americans are more likely to identify the characters on the television cartoon The Simpsons than rights included in the First Amendment.

      "There are a lot of soft courses," Mattera said. "Classes in American history go by the wayside."

      Apparently Mr. Mattera himself missed a few history lessons along the way. It took a lot of ignorance for him to reference the First Amendment as justification for trying to limit "what is said and thought" to his own point of view -- but then it took a lot of arrogance to call his group "Young America's Foundation," when it's anything but.

      To follow Mattera's logic, perhaps we should make college electives an historical anachronism by limiting courses to those already taken and approved by YAF members. All we need are their college transcripts so we'll know, from a higher authority, which studies are appropriate and which are inappropriate for every student in every institution of higher learning across the nation (and to check YAF members' grades in American government - if they ever studied it).

      Or, we could ignore American history and the First Amendment by adopting a national standard -- say, Liberty University's course catalog and list of majors. If it's good enough for Jason Mattera and Jerry Falwell, it must be good enough for the rest of us - maybe too good for some of us, huh.

      Under our new guidelines, professors who strayed from YAF-sanctioned course content could either be fired or forced to accept counseling from a newly-minted Genesis International, an "ex-liberal ministry" for the New Enlightenment - something along the lines of Exodus International for "ex-gays."

      Students who questioned their college's policies could be channeled into Healing and Restoration 101, a three-year, distance-learning program by James Dobson and Ted Haggard (send that love offering today, hon).

      Does that sound like the American history you studied?


      December 15, 2006

      Happy Bill of Rights Day!

      The United States Bill of Rights became law December 15, 1791:

      The Bill of Rights includes rights such as freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly. It also includes a clause assuring the American people that the bill of rights should not be interpreted as a comprehensive list of all rights belonging to Americans, but rather a list of the most important rights.

      After the Constitution was ratified, the first Congress met in Federal Hall in New York City. Most of the delegates agreed that a Bill of Rights was needed and most of them believed that the same rights should be enumerated.

      The task of drafting the Bill of Rights fell to James Madison, who based his work on George Mason's earlier work, Virginia Declaration of Rights. It had been decided earlier that the Bill of Rights would be added to the Constitution as amendments (the list of rights was not included in the text of the Constitution because it was feared that changing the document's text would necessitate the rather painful process of re-ratifying the Constitution).

      On November 20, 1789, New Jersey became the first state in the newly-formed Union to ratify these amendments. Other states followed, and the ten amendments that were made law on December 15, 1791 soon became known as the Bill of Rights.


      Its value, in Madison's view, was in part educational, in part as a vehicle that might be used to rally people against a future oppressive government, and finally -- in an argument borrowed from Thomas Jefferson -- Madison argued that a declaration of rights would help install the judiciary as "guardians" of individual rights against the other branches.


      Exactly 217 years after becoming the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights, New Jersey took another small but important step toward guaranteeing full citizenship to all its citizens:
      New Jersey became the third state to bless civil unions as an alternative to marriage for same-sex couples, choosing a middle ground that establishes a type of relationship that didn’t exist before Vermont created it in 2000.

      The authors of the New Jersey measure said they intend for civil unions to be identical to marriage in all but name. The legislation spells out specific benefits to be extended, such as full adoption rights and the right to change surnames without a court petition. It also updates state marriage statutes by painstakingly adding the phrase "or civil union" after every mention of "marriage" in more than 80 pages of rules governing nuptials.

      Currently, partnership rights for same-sex couples differ widely in the seven states that recognize some form of gay unions. Besides marriage licenses in Massachusetts and civil unions in Connecticut, New Jersey and Vermont, domestic partnership registries have been created in three states: California, Hawaii and Maine.

      Domestic partnerships differ from civil unions in that they confer a specific list of benefits to registered couples who may be of the same-sex or opposite sex. For example, Maine and Hawaii list specific legal rights for domestic partners such as inheritance and hospital visitations. California's domestic partnership law is similar to civil unions in that it extends all state-level rights and responsibilities to registered domestic partners.

      "The Declaration of rights is like all other human blessings alloyed with some inconveniences... But the good in this instance vastly outweighs the evil."

      "If we cannot secure all our rights, let us secure what we can."

      --Letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, dated March 15, 1789


      "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."


      --Amendment IX

      December 01, 2006

      Go Greyhound

      Secret threat-screening scores raise civil liberties concern

      WASHINGTON - Without notifying the public, federal agents for four years have assigned millions of international travelers, including Americans, computer-generated scores rating the risk they pose of being terrorists or criminals.

      The travelers aren't allowed to see or directly challenge the risk assessments, which the government intends to keep on file for 40 years.


      Some or all data in the system can be shared with state, local and foreign governments for use in hiring, contracting and licensing decisions. Courts and even private contractors can obtain data under certain circumstances.

      "It is simply incredible that the Bush administration is willing to share this sensitive information with foreign governments and even private employers, while refusing to allow U.S. citizens to see or challenge their own terror scores," Leahy said. This system "highlights the danger of government use of technology to conduct widespread surveillance of our daily lives without proper safeguards for privacy."


      "I have never seen anything as egregious as this," said Kevin Mitchell, president of the Business Travel Coalition, an advocate for business travelers. It's "evidence of what can happen when there isn't proper oversight and accountability."

      "What's going on here is the terrorist scoring of U.S. citizens which really should have been left on the shelf after TIA was canned," said Mark Rotenberg, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center.

      Jayson Ahern, a Customs and Border Protection assistant commissioner, said the agency intends to eventually enter data for all border-crossers in the ATS database.

      Government officials asserted that creating a vast database over time on travelers — including those who are law-abiding — will help analysts build models of normal and suspicious behavior. Ahern said there are 309 million land and sea border crossings and 87 million air border crossings each year — more than 95 percent for lawful reasons.


      Airport X-rays reveal passengers' bodies

      WASHINGTON — The federal government plans this month to launch the nation's first airport screening system that takes potentially revealing X-ray photos of travelers in an effort to find bombs and other weapons.

      Transportation Security Administration screeners at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport will test a "backscatter" machine that could vastly improve weapons detection but has been labeled a "virtual strip search" by the American Civil Liberties Union. Backscatter can show clear images of nude bodies.

      November 09, 2006

      Mexico City approves gay civil unions

      MEXICO CITY (AP) -- Mexico City's assembly on Thursday passed legislation to legally recognize gay civil unions in the capital....

      "This law ... does not require anyone else to change their thinking, nor does it hurt the concept of the nuclear family," said one legislator.

      If the law is enacted, Mexico City will join the ranks of the Argentine capital, Buenos Aires, and the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, which already have approved civil unions.

      At the national level, lawmakers in Costa Rica and Colombia have debated, but not passed, similar measures.

      Elsewhere on Thursday, a parliamentary committee approved proposals for same-sex marriages in South Africa, clearing the way for the passage of legislation there.

      The Netherlands, Canada, Belgium and Spain have legalized same-sex marriage, while several other European countries have laws giving same-sex couples the right to form legally binding civil partnerships.
      Meanwhile, back in the US . . .
      ... Only the state of Massachusetts allows gay marriage, while Vermont and Connecticut permit civil unions.

      Seven states approved gay-marriage bans in elections Tuesday, joining 20 that had done so in previous elections.

      In Arizona, the defeat of the ban stemmed in part from its scope. It not only would have reinforced an existing state law against same-sex marriage, but also would have barred any government entities from recognizing civil unions or domestic partnerships in providing benefits to employees.

      October 25, 2006

      New Jersey court: Apply equal rights to same-sex couples

      "Saying times have changed, New Jersey's highest court on Wednesday guaranteed gay couples the same rights as married heterosexuals but left it to state lawmakers to decide if such unions can be called marriage."

      "The ruling leaves state lawmakers with two options -- allow gays to marry in the same way as others, or develop a parallel system of unions for same-sex couples. That second option would leave New Jersey with civil unions akin to those in Vermont." - Reuters

      The court held: "Denying committed same-sex couples the financial and social benefits and privileges given to their married heterosexual counterparts bears no substantial relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose. The Court holds that under the equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and benefits enjoyed by opposite-sex couples under the civil marriage statutes." -
      Think Progress

      George Bush, October 26, 2004: "I don't think we should deny people rights to a civil union, a legal arrangement, if that's what a state chooses to do so." -
      AmericaBlog

      • My comments on marriage equality here.

      July 03, 2006

      Happy Independence Day

      Rain Lily


      "From the sublime to the ridiculous..."

      Tom Toles, Washington Post

      June 17, 2006

      Know thy neighbors, thy friends and thy family


      "... and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32

      Florida law prohibits same-sex unions and criminalizes adoption of children by gays and lesbians. Yet many politicians, religious leaders and voters are convinced that additional discriminatory language must be added to the state constitution to protect heterosexual marriage.

      The proposed Florida Marriage Protection Amendment reads:

      "Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized."

      "If Florida voters pass this constitutional amendment, not only will hundreds of thousands of tax-paying gay and lesbian couples forever be denied equal access to civil marriage, but all other forms of legal recognition, including domestic partnerships and civil unions, may no longer be valid or recognized." (Know Thy Neighbor)


      Leading foes of equal rights identified by name

      This week the Christ Church of Peace, a nondenominational church in Jacksonville, launched a campaign to identify the sponsors, endorsers, and 400,000 Florida petitioners who support the amendment. The campaign was quickly denounced by groups that support the initiative.

      "It's a gross invasion of people's privacy," said John Stemberger, president and general counsel of the Florida Family Policy Council, an offshoot of James Dobson's national Christian conservative group Focus on the Family. (
      Miami Herald)

      To santimonious gay bashers, the dissemination of public records -- by a church, no less -- is simply more evidence of the persecution of true Christians. Their reaction to losing the flimsy cloak of anonymity reveals the typical, unsurprising hypocrisy that marks all their self-righteous crusades of prejudice, intolerance and hate.

      In perusing the list of amendment petitioners, I found not only many of my own neighbors (one next door, in fact), but family members (near and far), friends (straight and gay), and past business and professional associates; names of women who have married and divorced numerous times; names of married men who have conducted sexual affairs with married women (and with other men); names of convicted felons and their parents; names of people who never question the financial subsidies (medical, Social Security, retirement and other benefits) they and their families derive from gays and lesbians whose families are excluded from equal benefits and legal security; names of parents guilty of abusing and neglecting their own children; names of those who support state laws that deny countless foster children a permanent, loving family.

      Read, and weep.

      March 25, 2006

      Belarusian struggle for freedom continues


      Police Club Demonstrators in Belarus

      MINSK, Belarus (AP) -- Black-clad riot police clubbed demonstrators as government opponents marched Saturday in defiance of a show of force by authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko that has drawn U.S. and European Union sanctions.