December 31, 2005

Run off to Swampwater . . .

. . . and see what a difference sea level makes

Swampwater, Florida

"In the great comedy of human endeavor, where enterprise, government, art and science converge, the pillar of achievement, seeking to rise above man's greed, delusion and stupidity, provides a guiding...did I ever tell you that I was born with antlers?...I'm hungry now, I want a sandwich."

December 29, 2005

Way down upon the Suwannee


Home for the holidays...
one of the views along the way.
Click on image to enlarge.

December 23, 2005

Conservatives trust Bush, not the Constitution

David Brooks, NY Times columnist and PBS political analyst, asked readers this week to play a little game of "You're the president." He believes that "FISA shortcomings," in his words, practically forced the Bush administration to evade legal and legislative oversights when it designed its secret program of spying on Americans.

Brooks' game defines four choices, none of them perfect, from which the president chose the only acceptable option, according to Brooks. After long and hard thought, intensive research, and consultation with "conservative" legal advisors, the following options were the only ones that Brooks -- and apparently the entire Bush administration -- could imagine:


  1. "Ask Congress to rewrite the FISA law...." Bad idea, says Brooks. The president cannot trust Congress to rewrite the law in a way that would give him the unfettered power he needs to keep us safe in the brave new world of the 21st Century.

  2. "... Avoid Congress and set up a self-policing mechanism using the Justice Department and the NSA Inspector general," (whatever "self-policing" means). The problems there, according to Mr. Brooks? That would be "legally dubious"; some intelligence bureaucrat might leak the secret spy program in hopes of throwing a presidential election; and again, the president can't trust Congress to keep a secret spy program secret.

  3. "... Informal congressional oversight." Another terrible idea, says Mr. Brooks. The president does not trust Congress. Why risk having some congressman (liberal traitor, in all likelihood) blab that the executive branch is spying on the public? Someone might question who is being monitored and how that information is being used.

  4. That left the president one last, dreadful option, in Brooks' opinion: "Face the fact that we will not be using our best technology to monitor the communications of known terrorists. Face the fact that the odds of an attack on America just went up."

Wow! Thanks, David. You certainly simplified things for anyone unable to think of alternatives to one-man rule: Trust the president to operate in secret. Or die.

To steadfast Bush supporters, the job of keeping America safe is complicated because the president can trust no one outside his inner circle -- not the courts, not the bureaucratic spies themselves, not the Congress, and least of all, the people. The thought never occurs to them that putting blind faith in any president -- especially this one -- is not an option for the ones of us who value both liberty and security.

Don't you find it curious, Mr. Brooks, even hypocritical, that the so-called conservative wing of American politics places great faith in George W. Bush the man, but little trust in the people and the rule of law? You do remember, do you not, the cry for "the rule of law" that still echoes from Republican gamers who struggled mightly to bring down another president? You do understand the significance of that little piece of paper, the U. S. Constitution?


Because "You're the president" is a game designed for the simple-minded, I'll keep my play calling simple as well. You failed to include the one option which is not optional at all, but a mandatory rule the president -- any president, even one you trust -- must respect if the country is to remain secure against threats, both foreign and domestic:
Obey the law.

December 20, 2005

CensureBush.org campaign launched


Et tu, C-SPAN?

'Fair and balanced,' or tilting?

"Balance is our No. 1 goal," Peter Slen, Washington Journal's executive producer and part-time host, once said, adding: "We keep official stats on the Washington Journal, OK? Republicans, Democrats, conservative, liberal, moderates—we try to stay within the week nearly perfect as far as the balance goes."

Extra! studied Washington Journal's guestlist, tabulating all 663 guests who appeared on the show in the six-month period from November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005. Guests were classified by gender, ethnicity, party affiliation (if any) and occupation. The study also looked at the think tanks most prominently represented on the show.

Among the most striking findings:

  • Of the partisan guests, Republicans outnumbered Democrats nearly two to one (134 to 70). Not a single representative of a third party appeared during the study period.

Read the rest: C-SPAN slanting right

December 17, 2005

Something wicked this way comes


Bush's authoritarian presidency is America's greatest threat

"By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes." - Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, Scene IV, Act i.

With the world's most powerful military at his command, George W. Bush approved policies three years ago that enpowered and encouraged members of the U. S. military to spy on American citizens -- people like you and me:

Under the programs, civilians and military personnel at defense installations are encouraged to file reports if they believe they have come across people or information that could be part of a terrorist plot or threat, either at home or abroad. The Talon reports are fed into a database managed by the Counterintelligence Field Activity, or CIFA, a three-year-old Pentagon agency whose budget and size are classified.

[....]

The Talon reports -- the number is classified, officials said -- can consist of "raw information" that "may or may not be related to an actual threat, and its very nature may be fragmented and incomplete," according to a 2003 memo signed by then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz.

Now that the programs have been exposed,
the Pentagon is promising to 'review' its massive and poorly managed database on U. S. citizens:

"On the surface, it looks like things in the database that were determined not to be viable threats were never deleted but should have been," [a senior defense department official] said. "You can also make the argument that these things should never have been put in the database in the first place until they were confirmed as threats."

Who will determine which supposed threats are confirmed and how reports will be handled in the future? Why, the same folks who created the illegal programs in the first place -- the same Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld Pentagon that cannot account for billions of missing dollars in Iraq; the same leadership that gave us Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and "happy Iraqi" news via Pentagon propaganda purchased with funds that should have been spent on body armor for soldiers.


Isn't a Rumsfeld-led Pentagon review of its own activities rather like Duke Cunningham investigating bribery, Karl Rove investigating dirty tricks, Bill Frist investigating the SEC or Tom DeLay investigating political sleaze? Not to mention all the administration's deceitful "reviews" of WMD stockpiles in Iraq, the imaginary links between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and the "slam dunk" distortion of intelligence that led us into the Iraq invasion.


Further demonstrating his administration's contempt for the U. S. Constitution, the president also admitted this week that, under the guise of protecting the country from terrorist threats, he had secretly authorized the National Security Agency to bypass or ignore -- whenever some nameless administration official or NSA spy deemed it expedient -- the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and to eavesdrop on U. S. citizens:

Previously, surveillance on American soil was generally limited to foreign embassies.

American law usually requires a secret court, known as a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to give permission before intelligence officers can conduct surveillance on US soil.

Some people, mainly diehard Bush supporters, may be unconcerned that their own personal mail, telephone conversations, internet emails, blog comments and web surfing history -- even their computer hard drives -- may be monitored by Big Brother. They trust the Bush administration to use its assumed powers properly, although Mr. Bush himself refuses to tell us the rules to the spy game he is playing upon his own people. They trust an administration that remains cloaked in secrecy, that outs a CIA operative to advance its own agenda, that buys and distributes propaganda with our tax dollars.


So, before shrugging off the authoritarian practices that unleashed America's most powerful spy agency upon us, we should take a closer look at the National Security Agency's tremendous size and powers:

A few miles out of Washington, on Route 1 to Baltimore, lies an inconspicuous military installation called Fort Meade. You would not notice it unless you knew what to look for. In fact, on most road maps, Fort Meade does not exist. And yet it contains the largest mass of secrets in the world.

Though invisible on the map, 38,000 people work at the agency every day, more than the CIA and FBI put together - every one of them sworn to a lifetime of secrecy. They have their own police force, shopping malls and sports complexes - and their own television network, complete with newsreaders.


According to author James Bamford, who has studied the NSA for years, each one of their dozen largest listening posts around the world picks up more than two million communications an hour - cell phones, diplomatic traffic, emails, faxes. That works out at 500 million hours every day.

Feel safer?

I don't. Not with a sociopathic president who sports a track record of creating his own reality, twisting intelligence, ignoring human rights and operating in secrecy at every opportunity. His aggressive attempts to seize uncontrolled executive powers have met with little or no judicial oversight, with absolutely nothing but self-serving lip service to the rule of law from a Republican controlled Congress, with acquiescence and political cowardice from the opposition party, and with impotent press coverage by a supine, incurious and sometimes complicit fourth estate


The president's mad grab for unlimited power is being done under the guise of fighting terrorism -- but the security measures and political machinations are defined and plotted by his inner circle of allies behind closed doors. What a tragedy for our country that we have allowed one man, backed by a Republican Party's lust for power at any cost, to use 9/11 as an opening to pursue an authoritarian agenda.

As Benjamin Franklin put it over two centuries ago, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty."


George W. Bush not only has made us less free, he has made us less safe. The level of arrogance, recklessness, and lawlessness displayed by this president and his administration should arouse not only fear and concern -- but condemnation and outrage -- from every American.


December 15, 2005

Absolute power corrupts absolutely


New tests fuel doubts about vote machines in Florida
...
Republican apparatchiki not concerned


WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 - A political operative with hacking skills could alter the results of any election on Diebold-made voting machines -- and possibly other new voting systems in Florida -- according to the state capital's election supervisor, who said Diebold software has failed repeated tests.
A spokeswoman for the secretary of state's office [political appointment of Jeb Bush] said any faults [Leon County election chief] Sancho found were between him and Diebold.

Bush touts 'watershed' Iraq vote
...
a la Florida 2000


WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 - In his final push before elections in Iraq, President Bush on Wednesday touted this week's election as a milestone for the Iraqi people and described how 2005 has been a historic year for the Middle East.

Bush accepts 'ban on torture' proposal
...
long after everyone but Cheney knew he had little choice


WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 - President Bush embraced Sen. John McCain's proposal to ban cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of terrorism suspects on Thursday, reversing months of opposition that included White House veto threats.

Bush secretly authorized NSA to spy on US citizens - without court-approved warrants
...
fighting the 'enemy' here


WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 - Months after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials.

Bush-Rumsfeld Defense Department illegally spying on US citizens
...
Beware the Quakers bearing peace


WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 - A year ago, at a Quaker Meeting House in Lake Worth, Fla., a small group of activists met to plan a protest of military recruiting at local high schools. What they didn't know was that their meeting had come to the attention of the U.S. military.

A secret 400-page Defense Department document obtained by NBC News lists the Lake Worth meeting as a “threat” and one of more than 1,500 “suspicious incidents” across the country over a recent 10-month period.

Senator Feingold finally has numbers on his side
...
along with the US Constitution


WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 - In Congress, where numbers are everything, the math on the Patriot Act suddenly seems to be moving in favor of Sen. Russell Feingold.

He was a minority of one four years ago, when the Wisconsin Democrat cast the lone Senate vote against the USA Patriot Act in the traumatic weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks. The law, he said then, gave government too much power to investigate its citizens. Ninety-nine senators disagreed.

Now add more than two dozen senators to Feingold's side, including the leaders of his party and some of the chamber's most conservative Republicans, and the balance of power shifts.


December 16 update ....

Senate rejects extension of falsely-named 'Patriot Act'
...
as Republicans struggle fiercely to retain 'absolute power'


WASHINGTON, Dec. 16 - The Senate on Friday rejected attempts to reauthorize several provisions of the USA Patriot Act as infringing too much on Americans' privacy and liberty, dealing a huge defeat to the Bush administration and Republican leaders.

In a crucial vote early Friday, the bill's Senate supporters were not able to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a threatened filibuster by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and their allies. The final vote was 52-47.

December 14, 2005

Santa's holiday helper


Apples found her Halloween photo to her liking, so she has honored us with an appearance at the Christmas holidays.




Apples (Appalachian Bloom) is Kuz'n Kirk's 'deerly' beloved hound. She loves dressing up any time there's a party.

Belarus tightens the screws again

Online dating banned; study and work abroad limited

MINSK, Belarus - Belarusian lawmakers on Wednesday passed legislation that would crack down on Internet dating and online spouse searches in the latest in a series of stringent government controls backed by authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko.


[...]


Lukashenko has made his nation of 10 million people a pariah in the West by stifling dissent, persecuting independent media and opposition parties and prolonging his power through elections that international organizations say were marred by fraud.

More....

December 13, 2005

The Rainwater prophecy

What are we non-billionaires to do?

This article was published 13 Dec 2005 by
Fortune:

Richard Rainwater doesn't want to sound like a kook. But he's about as worried as a happily married guy with more than $2 billion and a home in Pebble Beach can get. Americans are "in the kind of trouble people shouldn't find themselves in," he says. He's just wary about being the one to sound the alarm.

[....]

Rainwater is no crackpot. But you don't get to be a multibillionaire investor—one who's more than doubled his net worth in a decade—through incremental gains on little stock trades. You have to push way past conventional thinking, test the boundaries of chaos, see events in a bigger context. You have to look at all the scenarios, from "A to friggin' Z," as he says, and not be afraid to focus on Z. Only when you've vacuumed up as much information as possible and you know the world is at a major inflection point do you put a hell of a lot of money behind your conviction.

[....]

Such insights have allowed Rainwater to turn moments of cataclysm into gigantic paydays before.

[....]

The next blowup, however, looms so large that it scares and confuses him. For the past few months he's been holed up in hard-core research mode—reading books, academic studies, and, yes, blogs. Every morning he rises before dawn at one of his houses in Texas or South Carolina or California (he actually owns a piece of Pebble Beach Resorts) and spends four or five hours reading sites like LifeAftertheOilCrash.net or DieOff.org, obsessively following links and sifting through data. How worried is he? He has some $500 million of his $2.5 billion fortune in cash, more than ever before. "I'm long oil and I'm liquid," he says. "I've put myself in a position that if the end of the world came tomorrow I'd kind of be prepared." ....

Fortune article...

Further reading...

Fuel oil: Farmer Hobbs grows his own

Plant it, grow it, rotate it, burn it

This is not such a ridiculous concept for Steven Hobbs, farmer working the land at Kaniva, eighty kilometres west of Dimboola near the Victorian/South Australian border. He's gone into production of his own bio-diesel fuel to beat the rising commercial fuel prices. "My experience began... five years ago when I was first exposed to the idea of growing bio-diesel as a farmer," he says. "Initially it started as a philosophical statement... I believe in farmers making themselves more sustainable."

The material Steven uses to produce his own fuel is found in his own backyard. "Being a farmer I actually already grow it. I grow canola... and traditionally [farmers have] sold it into... [the] human consumption market," he says.

"Essentially bio-diesel is a modified vegetable oil. A chemical process that's used to remove the glycerol component from the molecule... essentially transforms the vegetable oil into a... renewable fuel... that has very much the same characteristics as conventional fossil diesel, except it has the advantages of reducing emissions up to 60 per cent. And it's also a renewable source of energy," he says.

Yet the idea of renewable energy is not new to Australian farmers. "It's not a new idea - every farmer in Australia used to do it, they used to allocate 25 per cent of their cropping area for oats to cut for horses. Horses were organic tractors, if you want to put it that way," he says.

For Steven, the current global trend upwards in fuel prices provides great incentive for Australian farmers to get in on the fuel market, and to help reduce fossil emissions contributing to the greenhouse effect.

December 12, 2005

Australia celebrates 2005 music festival the old-fashioned way

Meredith, Australia--One of the most revered and long running music festivals in Australia celebrates its 15th birthday the only way it knows how - at full capacity and full volume.

Barefoot running at its best

What begun as a time-filler because of a band no-show at a Meredith Festival over a decade ago has now become one of the strangest music festival traditions in Australia; at around 3pm on the Sunday, nude and underpanted participants in the Meredith Gift line up for a dash to grab a pair of undies from the dust in front of the stage. Cheating is encouraged. Dogs are allowed (but must be underpanted). The prize? A slab of beer and a t-shirt.

This year's Gift attracted corporate sponsorship as well as hundreds of (mostly) male competitors, competing first in an all-in dash, finishing with a ten member final full of the kinds of emotion and group-hugging we've come to expect in Australian sports stars.

The winners? Surely the 10,000 people who came for a pleasant three day outing at a farm just outside of Meredith...

News spiral: Last week's headlines redux

December 10, 2005

They're killing their own people...

SHANGHAI, Dec. 9 -
Residents of a fishing village near Hong Kong said Friday that as many as 20 people were killed by the paramilitary police this week, in an unusually violent clash that marked an escalation in the widespread social protests roiling the Chinese countryside. Villagers said as many as 50 other residents remained unaccounted for since the shootings on Tuesday.

It was the largest known use of force by security personnel against citizens since the killings around Tiananmen Square in 1989. That death toll is still unknown, but is estimated to have been in the hundreds.

The Bush administration's justification for invading Iraq was little more than "Saddam killed his own people."

Based on their previous logic, Bush and his war council must this very minute be planning a US invasion of China. China has stockpiles of WMD (actually verified by the UN), weapons that could "one day pose a threat to our interests." Better we kill the enemy "there" before we have to face him "here." We mustn't wait for the "mushroom cloud over an American city." They "gotta understand" we are not "reprehensible" cowards unwilling to "take freedom and democracy" to their enslaved masses. Remember, they killed their own people.

What more do we need? Don't we have in China the prime antecedents, based on the Bush doctrine, for a preemptive war? Shock and awe, baby! Bring it on.


Or not.

Unlike Iraq, China would defend herself with an army like the one we were falsely told that Iraq possessed in 2003 (remember "Saddam, the new Hitler?"). China is a world economic power, a major US trading partner and holder of our national debt -- an exporter of cheap goods, but an importer of O-I-L.


The Bush administration told us that Iraq was an enemy to be feared and destroyed: that China was our friend. I wonder whether China's prisons have room for a few planeloads of Iraqi insurgents who need a good, swift rendering far away from prying eyes?

Could that be any more hypocritical than what our shanghaied government is already doing in our name -- with our blood and treasure?

Related stories...

Dec. 12 update from New York Times:

BEIJING - The commander of paramilitary forces who opened fire on villagers protesting land seizures has been detained by the authorities in connection with the shootings, an extraordinary response that suggested high-level concern over whether the crackdown was justified.

Dec. 13 update: China and India beat US on direct investment destination.

'Naughts cruise to first 'national championship'

MIAMI -- Lakeland left no doubt it has the best high school football team in the state and perhaps the country Friday night, capturing its second straight Class 5A championship in a 39-10 rout of Fort Lauderdale St. Thomas Aquinas.

Going wire-to-wire as America's No. 1 team in the USA Today poll, the Dreadnaughts (15-0) posted their 30th straight victory before a crowd of 16,147 at Dolphins Stadium. It was Lakeland's fifth state championship and fourth in the last 10 years. The national championship that becomes official on Tuesday will be its first.

"I definitely didn't expect the score to be like that," said Billy Lowe, who was the quarterback in the Lakeland High program's biggest victory. "We're national champions, undefeated. It's the best feeling I've ever had in my life."

December 06, 2005

Lust for filthy lucre leads Ford to blow off gay customers

AFA's Wildmon gobbles up the affection; will Ford wake up with regrets?

Gay and lesbian advocacy groups sharply criticized Ford Motor Co. for agreeing to stop advertising in gay-themed publications in the face of a boycott by the conservative American Family Association.

Jerry Reynolds, an influential Ford dealer in Garland, Texas, who joined company executives in the meeting with AFA officials last week, said many dealers were concerned about the boycott. In the end, he said Ford made the changes because of financial concerns.
We know how much the gay bashers love to bring 'round their brand-spanking-new Jags and Land Rovers, and spin off to join the congregation in praying for the (gay) sinners they love (to hate) so much.

Good luck, Ford. You're on the path to certain success. Yep. And don't forget to send a few of your "On Fire for Hypocrites" discount vouchers to Reverends Dobson, Falwell, Robertson, Shelton, et al. They're probably in the market to add another luxury liner to their fleet -- and you'll need to make a lot of sales to your chosen friends. Advertising, ya know.

Now that you've caved to the AFA on this one, get ready for the next series of demands from the antigay crusaders. It's all about free (religious) enterprise, ain't it?

So pass the collection plate again and give thanks you have the AFA to guide you down the 'straight and narrow' superhighway to bigotry.


Update, 14 Dec 2005....

Time will tell.

December 03, 2005

Feel the love yet?

Dobson's religious facade fails to mask the hate

Denver--Focus on the Family, the conservative Christian group based in Colorado Springs, is withdrawing funds from Wells Fargo because of its alleged involvement in "pro-gay" causes.

"Focus on the Family has elected to end its banking relationship with Wells Fargo, motivated primarily by the bank's ongoing efforts to advance the radical homosexual agenda. These efforts are in direct opposition to the underlying principles and purpose of Focus, and thus a decision of conscience had to be made, and a stand taken," said a statement on the Focus Web site.

More ....

December 01, 2005

Same there as here: US buys good news

Bush administration exports its ethical standards to Iraq

Washington--U.S. Army officers have been secretly paying Iraqi journalists to produce upbeat newspaper, radio and television reports about American military operations and the conduct of the war in Iraq.

... Many military officials ... said they were concerned that the payments to Iraqi journalists and other covert information operations in Iraq had become so extensive that they were corroding the effort to build democracy and undermining U.S. credibility in Iraq. They also worry that information in the Iraqi press that's been planted or paid for by the U.S. military could "blow back" to the American public.

... On Tuesday, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld hailed what he called the country's "free media," saying they were acting as "a relief valve" through which Iraqis have been engaging in democratic debate and dialogue.

... In addition to the Army's secret payments to Iraqi newspaper, radio and television journalists for positive stories, U.S. psychological-warfare officers have been involved in writing news releases and drafting media strategies for top commanders, two defense officials said.

... While the Pentagon's media campaign in Iraq harks back to CIA efforts in Italy, Greece and elsewhere after World War II to discredit communism and promote pro-Western ideas, it also reflects a widespread belief by some Bush administration officials that the news media are merely another interest group to be spun, influenced, bullied or, if necessary, bought or rented.

... "They don't represent the public any more than other people do," White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card once said, as quoted in The New Yorker magazine. "In our democracy, the people who represent the public stood for election. I don't believe you have a check-and-balance function."

Opinion: Getting it right at Ole Miss

Ole Miss News Online, Oxford, MS--The primary sign of maturity is the changing of opinions once held. As children, everything seems black and white, good and bad. That kind of reasoning makes sense to an undeveloped mind. But as we age, things happen in our lives, for good or even for bad, that make us change, make us think and force us to see the world in a different way.

[....]

I hated the idea of homosexuality, the act itself. Being a Southern Baptist prude with an aversion to all things sexual in nature certainly didn't help. I also had an audience to cater to, an audience that I had begun to associate myself with personally -- those on the Christian right. I wanted them to like me, to support me. But they never understood, for the most part, my ideas of compassion and love toward the gay community. So I sold out.

All I can do is offer an apology. It may not be taken right away -- if ever -- and I understand. I had my own opinions, but acceptance was more important to me. Foolish, I see now in retrospect....